Book Your Health Coaching Call

Good Medicine

Holistic Health Coaching

Censorship

Cardiologist Advice Regarding mRNAJab

· ·

Best advice from two internationally well known cardiologists (one of whom was originally a jab proponent. He has since changed his stance after doing his own research). Russian roulette rarely ends without a tragedy.
Please. 🙏Abstain from any mRNA jab.
As Big Pharma continues to roll out more mRNA jabs (soon we’ll see them for the flu, RSV, and more), this danger will continue to escalate.
McCullough and Malhotra: More Doses of mRNA Vaccines, More Likelihood of Cardiac Harm

VAERS Covid-19 Adverse Reactions

· ·

VAERS is such an important tool. It helps us understand trends so that we can better protect ourselves and make educated and informed decisions as to our health and what we choose to allow into our body. The following explanation is from OpenVAERS:
************************************
From 2007 to 2010, computer scientist Ross Lazarus and medical doctor Michael Klompas led a study at Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, Inc. on behalf of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to identify ways to use Health Information Technology to improve reporting to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System(VAERS).[1] They discovered that 2.6% of all vaccinations led to adverse events. From their review of the literature and their own independent findings, they concluded that VAERS undercounts actual harms from vaccines by a factor of 10 to 100. They built a prototype so that all electronic medical records anywhere in the country could automatically submit a report to VAERS (thus solving the underreporting problem) at which point HHS stopped returning their calls and cut off all contact.
 
The underreporting problem obviously had not gone away, instead, HHS just decided to cover it up through omission.
 
In response to the astronomical rates of adverse events following Covid-19 injections, independent researchers have once again attempted to calculate the rate at which harms are underreported to VAERS (referred to as the Under Reporting Factor or URF). Steve Kirsch [2] and Dr. Jessica Rose [3] have calculated the URF at 31x to 51x in a number of different ways — basically in the middle of the range originally calculated by Lazarus and Klompas.
 
Using the newly obtained data from the V-Safe system, OpenVAERS is able to independently calculate the VAERS URF.
 
According to V-Safe’s own protocol anyone with a “significant medically attended health event” received a call from VAERS to file a report.[4]
 
We now have 10,108,273 persons registered with V-Safe. From the ICAN FOIA [5] we know that:
782,913 required medical care from a doctor or other healthcare professional.
1,344,330 missed work or school due to the vaccine.
1,225,867 were unable to conduct normal activities.
 
The SPLTTYPE field in VAERS allows us to see which reports have come from V-Safe. This is not a field you can search in Wonder, however you can search it on the OpenVAERS website. And we have a new page that breaks down the V-Safe symptoms and events.
 
Since 782,913 V-Safe participants required medical care, then 782,913 V-Safe participants should have received a phone call telling them to fill out a VAERS report, and there should be 782,913 reports in VAERS marked ‘vsafe’.
That’s not what happened. Instead, there are only 30,492 V-Safe reports in VAERS.
30,492 (actual VAERS reports from v-Safe) / 782,913 (injured people who were instructed to file a report) = 3.89% of the number that should be there. Or, expressed another way, a URF of 26x. And that’s it folks. That is the undercount.
This is the most conservative way to calculate the URF using the new V-Safe numbers. One could also use the 1,344,330 people who missed work or school due to the vaccine or the 1,225,867 people who were unable to conduct normal activities to calculate the URF — in each case one would end up with an even higher URF. Of course, because V-Safe depends on self-reporting through an app, one cannot use it to calculate the URF for vaccine fatalities.
 
It is important to underscore the absurdity of this whole situation:
• HHS knows that VAERS undercounts harms but refuses to talk about it.
• HHS will not allow electronic medical records to automatically report to VAERS even though Lazarus and Klompas showed that this is easy to set up.
• In anticipation of the rollout of Covid-19 vaccines, HHS introduced several new systems (V-Safe, CISA, Sentinel BEST, in addition to VAERS and VSD) which subdivides the vaccine-injured population into different databases and thus makes it difficult to determine the overall rate of harms.
• Adding insult to injury, HHS then called 782,913 vaccine-injured people participating in V-Safe to tell them to report to VAERS rather than just completing the VAERS report with them over the phone. And then over 96% of VAERS reports that should have been filed fall through the cracks and the bureaucrats at HHS can blame the vaccine-injured rather than taking responsibility themselves.
Thank you for supporting OpenVAERS and for sharing this information with others.
 
The OpenVAERS Team
 
choose wisely friends,
xoxo~ liz

Aberrant DNA

· ·

Aberrant DNA happens when it is exposed to what it shouldn’t be exposed to and as a result, changes happen. Man will never be God. God made us and He made our DNA to perform in a certain manner. In fact, He wove his name: Y-H-W-H into the very core of what makes us “us”.
 
I don’t believe this article from the Epoch times will be available here, so I’m copying and pasting. It is written by Dr. Mercola who has been pretty much banned and ghosted by social media in an effort to hide the truth. Shocking, I know 🙄(hopefully, you can read my sarcasm there).
 
From a personal vantage point, I am seeing an uptick in not just cancer, but also in chronic disease states either flaring up and/or showing up for the first time, and I feel confident that the information in the article below is pertinent as to why.
Here is his article (printed in Epoch Times October 14th 2022 edition and on Dr. Mercola’s website…. which I highly suggest following).
 
************************************
How Cancer Deaths From the COVID Jabs Are Being Hidden
By Joseph Mercola October 14, 2022 Updated: October 15
 
The fact that tumor sizes have become dramatically larger since 2021, patients are younger, and recurrence and metastasis are increasing should be front-page news, but you’re hearing nothing about it. Why is that? This former intelligence officer and strategist believes he knows why.
In a series of Twitter posts, The Ethical Skeptic — self-described as a former intelligence officer and strategist — has laid out a series of charts illustrating how cancer deaths are being mislabeled as COVID deaths.
The suspicion is that this is an effort to hide the fact that the COVID shots have resulted in soaring cancer rates. The Ethical Skeptic also takes a deep dive into the data in “Houston, We Have a Problem, Part 1,” on TheEthicalSkeptic.com.1
As noted in his article, seven out of the 11 International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes tracked by the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics — including cancer — saw sharp upticks starting in the first week of April 2021.
“This date of inception is no coincidence, in that it also happens to coincide with a key inflection point regarding a specific body-system intervention in most of the U.S. population,” The Ethical Skeptic notes.2 In other words, April 2021 was when large swaths of the American population were getting their first COVID jabs.
Cancer Diagnoses on the Rise
The following graph, highlighted on Dr. Jennifer Brown’s Substack,3 illustrates the cyclical wave pattern of cancer diagnoses, from January 2015 and October 1, 2022. As noted in the top-right text box:
“We should be at or near a seasonal nadir. Instead we are at an all-time CA [cancer] excess, and heading up. Keep in mind there is substantial lag to CA reporting, so this likely under-represents true excess.”
At no point during the past seven years have we seen this rate of new cancer diagnoses. Are the COVID shots to blame? Probably, unless we can identify another widespread environmental factor or exposure that was introduced to the population, en masse, in early 2021, that didn’t exist before.
CDC Fudging Death Records to Eliminate Cancer Signal
According to The Ethical Skeptic’s analysis of U.S. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) data, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has been filtering and redesignating cancer deaths as COVID deaths since Week 14 of 2021 to eliminate the cancer signal.4
The following two charts, posted on Twitter October 1 and 2, 2022, illustrates how cancer mortality is being artificially suppressed. As explained by The Ethical Skeptic:5,6
“The set dynamics are complex, but the principle is straightforward. When a death cert lists Cancer as the UCoD [underlying cause of death] and COVID as MCoD [main cause of death] — the UCoD & MCoD are being swapped, and COVID is being listed as the UCoD 100% (425/wk).
“This results in 20% of all COVID deaths each week, also happening to be persons dying of Cancer — which is egregiously higher than it should be. This is clear over-attribution = equates to exactly the difference between the Cancer and All Other ICD-10 code lag curves.”
The problem facing the CDC, is … What does one do when COVID Mortality is no longer substantial enough to conceal the excess Cancer Mortality?”
So, to rephrase, what The Ethical Skeptic is saying is that 20% of the weekly so-called COVID deaths are actually cancer deaths, which is rather astounding. But swapping the underlying and main causes of death, listing COVID as the main cause, hides (to some degree) the fact that cancer deaths are going through the roof.
According to his analysis, the COVID shot is killing 7,300 Americans per week. COVID, meanwhile, is killing 1,740 people.7 So, what will the CDC blame when COVID disappears and they can no longer swap the underlying and main cause of death designations?
Department of Defense Data Showed Massive Cancer Rise
Uncontrollable turbo-charged cancers the medical establishment had never seen before only started to occur after the rollout of the COVID jabs.8 Data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED), exposed by attorney Tom Renz and Sen. Ron Johnson (above), showed cancer rates among military personnel and their families basically tripled after the rollout of the shots.9
As you may recall, within days of the DMED data being revealed, the database was taken offline, allegedly to “identify and correct” a supposed data corruption problem, and when it came back, the data had been altered to hide these glaringly obvious safety signals.
Cancer patients are getting younger — The largest increase is among 30- to 50-year-olds
Tumor sizes are dramatically larger — Historically, 3-centimeter tumors were commonly found at the time of cancer diagnosis. Now, the tumors they’re finding are regularly 4 to 12 centimeters, which suggests they’re growing at a much faster rate than normal
Multiple tumors in multiple organs are becoming more common
Recurrence and metastasis are increasing — Kruger points out that many of the cancer patients she’s seeing have been in remission for years, only to suddenly be beset with uncontrollable cancer growth and metastasis shortly after their COVID jab
These “turbo-cancers,” as Kruger calls them, cannot be explained by delayed cancer screenings due to lockdowns and other COVID restrictions, as those days are long gone. Patients, despite having access to medical screenings as in years past, are showing up with grossly exacerbated tumor growths, and she believes this is because the cancers are being “turbo-charged” by the mRNA jabs.
Dr. Ryan Cole has also discussed the explosion of cancer (see video below). He believes the shots are primarily accelerating already existing cancers, by way of immune dysregulation.13 He noticed that cancers that could normally be controlled and kept in check, giving the patient several years of quality life, once they got the COVID jab, the cancer would suddenly grow out of control and rapidly lead to death.
Data Are so Corrupted, Will We Ever Get to the Truth?
The sad reality is that most data sources have at this point been so corrupted, it’s unlikely we’ll ever be able to get the whole truth. The CDC started manipulating the data in 2020 and hasn’t stopped. DMED, which has historically been one of the best and most pristine, has now been modified. Other data sources have suffered the same fate.
It’s beyond egregious, and data modelers like The Ethical Skeptic show just how bad the situation is. The idea that the CDC is massaging statistics to hide clear danger signals is appalling and unethical in the extreme, yet that’s what we’re seeing. The question is, why do they go to such lengths to protect such a lethal product? Your guess is as good as mine.
**********************************************************************************
 
A follow-up article written by a different doctor:

https://drturner.substack.com/p/losing-my-vaccine-religion-a-doctors?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=email&fbclid=IwAR1f3Wv55nx-bTCNwYgVs8KBb3s0eU6ge5shkGSm-8BAAyAIzzLAm24JMmY

Book Your Health Coaching CallBook Now